throughout the objection of defendants’ counsel, Judge Lyons allowed both edges to submit a page brief as into the type of purchase.
Defendants’ movement for a stay regarding the action, to compel arbitration, as well as for a protective purchase, in addition to plaintiff’s cross-motion for the order striking defendants’ objections to discovery, had been argued before Judge Lyons on August 6, 2004. The movement judge identified the contract between plaintiff and defendants being a agreement of adhesion and noted that the difficulties presented were whether “the conditions in the contract are in a way that they truly are become enforced in the procedural problem of arbitration . Continue reading